ANTECEDENTS OF EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY AND ORGANISATIONAL INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As an important source of organisational innovation, employee creativity is considered by most scholars and practitioners as a must for contemporary organisations. In this vein, organisational members should and must actively engage in generating new and valuable ideas. Various scholars have emphasized the value of identifying and understanding the factors contributing to employee creativity. The purpose of this research is therefore to investigate the factors fostering individual creativity and organisational innovation. To this end, we have developed a conceptual model and tested it with an empirical study based on a sample of 307 participants from Canadian organisations. The results reveal that knowledge sharing and person–organisation fit have positive impacts on individual creativity. Furthermore, personal trust moderates the relationship between business ethics and individual creativity. The results also show that an initiative-friendly culture moderates the impact of individual creativity on organisational innovation.These findings offer a new framework for developing further studies on creativity and innovation, as well as important practical implications for managers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it