MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600693057

Game Performance Decisions of International Baccalaureate Students in Korea and Students in a Traditional American High School

2016· article· en· W2600693057 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brett Everhart, Tyler Everhart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumPhysical educationMathematics educationPedagogySubject (documents)PsychologySociologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Middle and high school students engaged in physical education learning activities during the course of an academic year may be able to strengthen problem-solving and decision making skills necessary for success in the other curricular areas of the schools. It is also possible to support the problem-solving and critical thinking initiatives emphasized by teachers in other subject areas by having physical education students engage in learning activities and contemporary instructional model-based lessons which focus more on tactical decision-making. Because of the focus of some contemporary physical education instructional models on the development of game sense and tactical decision-making/problem-solving, it is possible that schools with certain types of curricular emphases and requirements may put physical education students in better position to become more tactically sound while competing in various sporting activities than would other types of curricular requirements in other schools. It is also possible that a focus on tactical decision making in physical education could support a critical thinking culture in the entire school curriculum framework, particularly the highly praised International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum. Many IB schools are attended by students who travel to and live in other countries. In this growing global society, it is possible that middle and high school students attending schools in other countries may have an advantage over young people who have not traveled outside of their countries, particularly those in the United States. By simply traveling and living in another country and having to understand economic, social, political, and cultural issues as well as living according to a different set of customs and expectations, American students may demonstrate the ability to solve problems and make decisions in different ways than their American counterparts without the experience of traveling and living abroad. Now, add to that the curricular experience of those who attend middle and high schools using the International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum, it is possible that the entire experience would enable these middle and high school students to make better and more appropriate tactical decisions in physical education class than those American students without that same set of global experiences. Curricular Influence Within traditional college preparatory high schools, American students have demonstrated a lower proficiency on core subjects and a lower entry rate into post-secondary education programs than students in eight other countries, including Canada, Ireland, and South Korea (Camoy & Rothstein, 2013)). In 2006, the Association for Career and Technical Education (2006) identified three education gaps in secondary education in the United States (U.S.): a. Domestic achievement gap, which can be described as the disparity in learning among American students in relation to racial and economic status; b. International achievement gap between U.S. students and young people from other nations; and c. Ambitions gap, a compilation of factors contributing to a lack of focus and purpose among American youth (cite the authors of Re-inventing the American High School part one) While it has been widely acknowledged in the last two decades that more rigor and accountability has been needed in American secondary education (Camoy & Rothestein, 2013; National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983; No Child Left Behind Act, 2001;). The model of education that is delivered traditionally in public education this country is vastly different than what is delivered in other countries by schools that utilize curricula grounded on critical thinking skills, such as the International Baccalaureate (IB) Programme and Advanced Placement courses (Park, Caine, & Wimmer, 2014). Within curricular models such as IB, critical thinking skills are emphasized, such as interpretation, inference, recognizing connections and analytical skills (Atkas & Guvan, 2015). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesFrench-language works237,207