MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2600693057

Game Performance Decisions of International Baccalaureate Students in Korea and Students in a Traditional American High School

2016· article· en· W2600693057 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brett Everhart, Tyler Everhart

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurriculumPhysical educationMathematics educationPedagogySubject (documents)PsychologySociologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Middle and high school students engaged in physical education learning activities during the course of an academic year may be able to strengthen problem-solving and decision making skills necessary for success in the other curricular areas of the schools. It is also possible to support the problem-solving and critical thinking initiatives emphasized by teachers in other subject areas by having physical education students engage in learning activities and contemporary instructional model-based lessons which focus more on tactical decision-making. Because of the focus of some contemporary physical education instructional models on the development of game sense and tactical decision-making/problem-solving, it is possible that schools with certain types of curricular emphases and requirements may put physical education students in better position to become more tactically sound while competing in various sporting activities than would other types of curricular requirements in other schools. It is also possible that a focus on tactical decision making in physical education could support a critical thinking culture in the entire school curriculum framework, particularly the highly praised International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum. Many IB schools are attended by students who travel to and live in other countries. In this growing global society, it is possible that middle and high school students attending schools in other countries may have an advantage over young people who have not traveled outside of their countries, particularly those in the United States. By simply traveling and living in another country and having to understand economic, social, political, and cultural issues as well as living according to a different set of customs and expectations, American students may demonstrate the ability to solve problems and make decisions in different ways than their American counterparts without the experience of traveling and living abroad. Now, add to that the curricular experience of those who attend middle and high schools using the International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum, it is possible that the entire experience would enable these middle and high school students to make better and more appropriate tactical decisions in physical education class than those American students without that same set of global experiences. Curricular Influence Within traditional college preparatory high schools, American students have demonstrated a lower proficiency on core subjects and a lower entry rate into post-secondary education programs than students in eight other countries, including Canada, Ireland, and South Korea (Camoy & Rothstein, 2013)). In 2006, the Association for Career and Technical Education (2006) identified three education gaps in secondary education in the United States (U.S.): a. Domestic achievement gap, which can be described as the disparity in learning among American students in relation to racial and economic status; b. International achievement gap between U.S. students and young people from other nations; and c. Ambitions gap, a compilation of factors contributing to a lack of focus and purpose among American youth (cite the authors of Re-inventing the American High School part one) While it has been widely acknowledged in the last two decades that more rigor and accountability has been needed in American secondary education (Camoy & Rothestein, 2013; National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983; No Child Left Behind Act, 2001;). The model of education that is delivered traditionally in public education this country is vastly different than what is delivered in other countries by schools that utilize curricula grounded on critical thinking skills, such as the International Baccalaureate (IB) Programme and Advanced Placement courses (Park, Caine, & Wimmer, 2014). Within curricular models such as IB, critical thinking skills are emphasized, such as interpretation, inference, recognizing connections and analytical skills (Atkas & Guvan, 2015). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,000

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,375
Écart entre enseignants0,332 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesTravaux en français237 207