MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600895993 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-926-3_6

Pereživanie – Experiencing Mathematics

2017· book-chapter· en· W2600895993 on OpenAlexaff
Wolff‐Michael Roth

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Unit (ring theory)Event (particle physics)Visual artsPsychologyMathematics educationComputer scienceAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a lecture from the last year of his life, L. S. Vygotsky articulated a unit of analy-sis [edinica] that does not reduce knowing and learning to the individual: pereživanie , often transliterated as ‘experience’, sometimes, but incorrectly, as ‘emotional experience’. Pereživanie is an event in which we find the unity/identity [edinstvo] of person and environment; it always has practical, affective, and intel-lectual shading. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207