MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600895993 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-926-3_6

Pereživanie – Experiencing Mathematics

2017· book-chapter· en· W2600895993 on OpenAlexaff
Wolff‐Michael Roth

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Unit (ring theory)Event (particle physics)Visual artsPsychologyMathematics educationComputer scienceAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a lecture from the last year of his life, L. S. Vygotsky articulated a unit of analy-sis [edinica] that does not reduce knowing and learning to the individual: pereživanie, often transliterated as ‘experience’, sometimes, but incorrectly, as ‘emotional experience’. Pereživanie is an event in which we find the unity/identity [edinstvo] of person and environment; it always has practical, affective, and intel-lectual shading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207