Bibliographic record
Abstract
Locative noun incorporation constructions in Inuktitut behave differently in the adult grammar than donon-locative instances. This study investigates whether the production of locative incorporation differsfrom other noun incorporation structures over the course of acquisition. One would expect locativeincorporation to be more difficult to acquire and therefore to emerge later, however this does not appearto be the case. Despite the added complexity of optional possessors and the added syntactic complexityof locational postpositions, locative incorporation appears to be acquired early and similarly to nounincorporation as both structures are produced by all children at the earliest ages studied. Additionally,an interesting pattern of acquisition emerged in the production of possessives. A phonologically reducedpossessor form emerges for several of the children, however the possessor is never reduced in the adultgrammar. Morphosyntactically speaking, this shows evidence of acquisition. The production of thereduced possessor shows that the concept is acquired in terms of morphology and syntax but is not yetfully acquired phonologically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".