MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600943604

Bioenergy research and development in an energy land of plenty

2014· article· en· W2600943604 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beth Candlish

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Global Energy Issues · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioenergyAgricultural economicsNatural resource economicsPopulationEnergy intensityFossil fuelEnergy sourceEnergy policyBusinessEconomicsBiofuelRenewable energyEnvironmental protectionGeographyEfficient energy useEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada, a country with an abundance of energy resources and scant population, initiated bioenergy development programmes in 1978 as a response to high oil prices. The energy intensity of key Canadian export industries is at least double the Canadian industry average of eight. Many differences in energy use in the different regions of Canada result from different resources being available in each region. Research spending in Canada is low, relative to other developed countries, and concern for efficient energy use has been low, except during the years when oil prices were high. Spending on bioenergy research has fallen since oil prices have returned to a low level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Global Energy IssuesSame topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207