MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601036842 · doi:10.11575/prism/30276

Enhanced Scalable Asynchronous Cache Consistency Scheme for Mobile Environment

2011· article· en· W2601036842 on OpenAlexaff
Derar Alassi, Reda Alhajj

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceStateful firewallCacheCache invalidationComputer networkSmart CacheStateless protocolCache algorithmsAsynchronous communicationDistributed computingCPU cacheNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important technique to reduce the contention on the limited bandwidth of wireless channels between mobile units and base stations is caching frequently accessed data items. In the literature, two approaches were proposed for cache consistency: Stateful and Stateless. In the Stateful approach, the server has to keep information about all the mobile units in its cell. On the other hand, in the stateless approach, the server does not store any information about clients. In this paper, we propose a hybrid cache consistency approach which combines the advantages of both Stateless and Stateful approaches; our approach has several characteristics in common with the Scalable Algorithm for Cache Consistency Scheme “SACCS”, which has been reported to have advantages compared to some major previous algorithms, including TimeStamps, Signatures, Amnesic Terminals and Asynchronous Stateful. The proposed approach reduces the side-effect of the sleep-wakeup patterns, and uses new communication messages intended to invalidate only the entries changed during the sleep time. Further, we propose a better replacement policy for the mobile unit cache, which considers the size of the removed entry to improve channel utilization. Experimental results show that the proposed approach increases the mobile cache hit, reduces the delay time of queries and reduces traffic in both uplink and downlink channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207