MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601055837 · doi:10.18260/1-2--14680

Application Of Xpc Target As A Prototyping Environment In Control System Laboratories

2020· article· en· W2601055837 on OpenAlex
R. Hurteau, Cedric Demers-Roy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal-time simulationComputer scienceRapid prototypingContext (archaeology)Real-time Control SystemMATLABControl systemRealization (probability)Control (management)Development environmentCode generationControl engineeringEmbedded systemOperating systemSoftware engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an example of application of xPC Target (product integrated with Matlab/Simulink) in an educational laboratory for real-time control experimentation. Equivalence between this environment and LabVIEW, another well known real-time environment for control, is discussed. Operating characteristics, cost, realization time, required expertise and implementation time are also presented. This example is realized on a classical system for position control using a DC motor. A complete control design process is applied on this test bench, from simulation to real-time control implementation. Result analysis indicates that xPC Target is a powerful environment for fast prototyping of real-time control loop as needed by undergraduate laboratories and for research activities implying fast testing of control algorithms on a specific system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207