MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601055837 · doi:10.18260/1-2--14680

Application Of Xpc Target As A Prototyping Environment In Control System Laboratories

2020· article· en· W2601055837 on OpenAlexaff
R. Hurteau, Cedric Demers-Roy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal-time simulationComputer scienceRapid prototypingContext (archaeology)Real-time Control SystemMATLABControl systemRealization (probability)Control (management)Development environmentCode generationControl engineeringEmbedded systemOperating systemSoftware engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an example of application of xPC Target (product integrated with Matlab/Simulink) in an educational laboratory for real-time control experimentation.Equivalence between this environment and LabVIEW, another well known real-time environment for control, is discussed.Operating characteristics, cost, realization time, required expertise and implementation time are also presented.This example is realized on a classical system for position control using a DC motor.A complete control design process is applied on this test bench, from simulation to real-time control implementation.Result analysis indicates that xPC Target is a powerful environment for fast prototyping of real-time control loop as needed by undergraduate laboratories and for research activities implying fast testing of control algorithms on a specific system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207