MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W260115063

A floristic inventory and spatial database for Fort Wainwright, interior Alaska

2016· other· en· W260115063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles H. Racine, Robert W. Lichvar, Barbara M. Murray, Gerald F. Tande, Robert Justin Lipkin, Michael Duffy

Bibliographic record

VenueUS Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandGeographyArchaeologyTundraLichenFlora (microbiology)ForestryEcologyGeologyArctic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract : An inventory of the vascular and ground-inhabiting cryptogam flora of Fort Wainwright, in interior Alaska, was conducted during the summer of 1995 to support land management needs related to the impact of training. Primary plant collecting, identification and verification were conducted by the Alaska Natural Heritage Program and the University of Alaska Museum. The work was supervised and the data compiled into a geographic information system by the USA Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory and the USA Waterways Experiment Station. Fort Wainwright covers 370,450 hectares (915,000 acres); it was divided into five areas: 1) the valleys of a cantonment area of base facilities, 2) the slopes and alpine areas of the Yukon-Tanana Uplands, 3) Tanana Flats and associated wetlands, 4) the upland buttes and Blair Lakes area in Tanana Flats, and 5) the floodplains of the Tanana and Chena Rivers. Over 100 sites were visited, with habitats ranging from very dry south-facing slopes to forest, floodplains, wetlands, and alpine tundra. Vascular collections represented 491 species (including subspecies and varieties), included about 26% of Alaska's vascular flora, and are considered to be relatively complete. The cryptogam collections included 219 species, representing 92 mosses, 117 lichens, and lO liverworts. The flora is characteristic of the circumpolarboreal forest and wetlands of both North America and Eurasia, but it also contains alpine and dry-grassland and steppe species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUS Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207