MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601169765 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000006912

Acute effects of cinacalcet on arterial stiffness and ventricular function in hemodialysis patients

2017· article· en· W2601169765 on OpenAlexafffund
Aurélie Poulin, Pierre-Luc Bellemare, Catherine Fortier, Fabrice Mac‐Way, Simon Desmeules, Karine Marquis, Valérie Gaudreault, Marcel Lebel, Mohsen Agharazii

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de QuébecUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKidney Foundation of CanadaCanadian Society of NephrologyUniversité LavalSanofiAmgen CanadaPfizerAmgen
KeywordsCinacalcetMedicinePulse wave velocityArterial stiffnessCalcimimeticInternal medicineHemodialysisCardiologyBlood pressureParathyroid hormoneSecondary hyperparathyroidismCalcium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Serum calcium concentration (Ca) plays an essential role in a vascular muscle tone and myocardial contractility. Previously, we showed that acutely lowering Ca by hemodialysis reduced arterial stiffness. Cinacalcet is a calcimimetic that lowers Ca and parathyroid hormone (PTH). The aim of the present study was to examine whether acute lowering of Ca by cinacalcet improves vascular stiffness and myocardial diastolic dysfunction. METHOD: This is a double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled crossover study that included 21 adult patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Subjects were assigned to placebo-cinacalcet (30 mg) or cinacalcet-placebo sequence. After each treatment period (7 days), aortic, brachial, and carotid stiffness were determined by examining carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), carotid-radial PWV (cr-PWV), and carotid distension. A central pulse wave profile was determined by radial artery tonometry and cardiac function was evaluated by echocardiography. RESULTS: Cinacalcet reduced PTH (483 [337-748] to 201 [71-498] ng/L, P < .001) and ionized Ca (1.11 [1.08-1.15] to 1.05 [1.00-1.10] mmol/L, P = .04). Cinacalcet did not reduced cf-PWV significantly (12.2 [10.4-15.4] to 12.2 [11.0-14.6] m/s, P = .16). After adjustments for mean blood pressure, sequence, carryover, and treatment effects, cf-PWV was not significantly lowered by cinacalcet (-0.35 m/s, P = .139). There were no significant changes in central blood pressures, brachial and carotid stiffness, and echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSION: In this study, 30 mg daily cinacalcet for 1 week did not have any significant impact on peripheral and central blood pressures, arterial stiffness parameters, or cardiac function (NCT01250405).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207