MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601301950

Arctic: Commerce, Governance and Policy

2015· article· en· W2601301950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pinaki Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

VenueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNAL · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceGlobal commonsFrontierPoliticsSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uttam Kumar Sinha and Jo Inge Bekkevold (ed.), Arctic: Commerce, Governance and Policy, (London: IDSA/Routledge, 2015), Pages 319, Price: $145.00This volume on the unveiling new frontier in politics and commerce is perhaps a maiden venture in documenting new opportunities and challenges in the region and the precise dynamics specific to the issues at stake - some of which play out multilaterally, and some bilaterally. Likewise, clashes of interests and collaborative initiatives can occur simultaneously, regardless of whether the players are allies or adversaries.The centre-piece of the book is the chapter by Uttam Sinha and Arvind Gupta, which encapsulates the very basic issues relating to the melting of the ice; its endangered cryosphere; and of course the Indo-centric view of the opportunities and threats, and strengths and weaknesses of the snow-melt.India and China are two of the five observer countries of the Indo-Pacific, who have been included in the periphery of the club of eight nations that constitute the Arctic Council. core nations are Russia, the USA, Canada, Denmark and Norway that share boundaries with the and the rear three are Finland, Sweden and Iceland.The chapter, and India: Strategic Awareness and Scientific Engagement, is an eminently readable attempt at explaining the phenomenon of the emerging new frontier of the Arctic, where the melting ice opens up global commons or a global heritage commons. It appears to be a cautious approach to the beginning of an argument, as the authors (one being the joint editor of the book) seek to deal with the myriad possibilities of the continent. They describe their choice as: as well as cautious (P 111)Interestingly, however, though the Paris meeting on Climate Change is on the anvil, even as the book was being written and published, the two authors do not dwell on the issue of what New Delhi's view on global warming should be. issue of carbon emissions by developing countries remains on the table because China has struck a bilateral agreement with the USA to escape multilateral demands. authors of this chapter or indeed the book itself do not look into the aspect of climate change at all, even as the loss of the snow-cap is a manifestation of the phenomenon.Instead, they focus on the twin issue of garnering natural resources that the offers and the security angle, where issues of national maritime boundaries like territorial waters, exclusive economic zones, and sovereignty, prevail. While that can be called pragmatism - a terminological avoidance of realism - the latter cannot certainly be viewed as a lack of idealism. reason for this is embedded in the argument about the commons.The realpolitik does come into play when Russia, a nation involved until recently, in unilaterally managing the region, plays offthe West's interests with that of a faraway China, though still an emerging superpower. In the chapter, Russia's China Policy in the Arctic, Tom Roseth details how Moscow, increasingly being marginalised in Europe, is seeking to bring parity between the American industrial might with that of the Chinese. In this telling paragraph, Roseth, a research fellow at the Centre for Asian Security Studies at the Norwegian Institute of Defence Studies, Oslo, Norway, writes: The development of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) is important for Russia due to its potential strategic and economic importance. Increased trans-shipment and extraction of resources along the route is a future income base for Russia. China as a resource hungry trading nation would most likely be one of the main beneficiaries and drivers for developing the NSR. Increased activity might also create some challenges for Russia. In pursuing a policy reflecting a strategic partnership with China over the NSR, the conditions would be (1) a common understanding on the usage of the route with a focus on commercial interests for Moscow, and (2) broad agreements on the regulation of shipping, including reasonable tariffs for transit that are considered acceptable to Beijing. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNALSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207