PCI with drug-eluting stents ≤ 12 months before surgery was linked to increased MI and cardiac death after surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ACP Journal Club21 March 2017PCI with drug-eluting stents ≤ 12 months before surgery was linked to increased MI and cardiac death after surgeryFlavia Kessler Borges, MD, PhD, P.J. Devereaux, MD, PhDFlavia Kessler Borges, MD, PhDMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (F.K.B., P.D.)Search for more papers by this author, P.J. Devereaux, MD, PhDMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (F.K.B., P.D.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2017-166-6-035 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Source CitationEgholm G, Kristensen SD, Thim T, et al. Risk associated with surgery within 12 months after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2622-32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27978946Clinical Impact RatingsCardiology: References1 Botto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan MT, et al; Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN (VISION) Writing Group. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:564-78. [PMID: 24534856] Google Scholar2 Wijeysundera DN, Wijeysundera HC, Yun L, et al. Risk of elective major noncardiac surgery after coronary stent insertion: a population-based study. Circulation. 2012;126:1355-62. [PMID: 22893606] Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (F.K.B., P.D.)This article was published at Annals.org on 7 March 2017. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 21 March 2017Volume 166, Issue 6Page: JC35KeywordsCardiac surgeryCohort studiesDrugsLongitudinal studiesMortalityMyocardial infarctionOdds ratioPercutaneous coronary interventionStent implantationSurgery ePublished: 21 March 2017 Issue Published: 21 March 2017 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2017 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".