Competition-based distributed BS power activation and user scheduling algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing cellular technologies in unlicensed band such as license assisted access (LAA)-LTE do not capture inter-cell interference (ICI) management which becomes more important in modern small cell network environments. Moreover, existing ICI management techniques not only can be operated in only licensed frequency band due to their centralized properties, but also have high computational complexities. In this paper, by invoking distributed optimization, we propose a fully distributed base station (BS) activation and user scheduling framework which can be operated in even unlicensed band because of its competition properties. Our simulation results demonstrate that (i) proposed competition-based BS activation and user scheduling framework (CBA) increases throughput of cell edge users by 112%-335% compared to conventional algorithms, (ii) the CBA properly catches up with the performance of optimal algorithm up to 93% in terms of overall performance and up to 95% in terms of edge user throughput, and (iii) the CBA also provides higher performance gains in the larger ratio of edge users and the smaller cell size, which indicates that the CBA well adapts to cellular network trend where cells are gradually smaller and densely deployed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it