MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601541142

SAIT continental African TAX conference : regulars

2015· article· en· W2601541142 on OpenAlexaff
Keith Engel

Bibliographic record

VenueTAXtalk · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsSAIT Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindsetPolitical scienceInvestment (military)GeographyEconomyDevelopment economicsEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past 10 years, the African region has become a location of growing interest as an investment destination for multinationals. This change in mindset is clearly being demonstrated as more South African multinationals shift their focus from a European/global emphasis to concentrate on neighbouring countries within the African region. In view of this change in investment focus, SAIT decided to direct a tax conference aimed at tax issues arising within continental Africa (in other words, sub-Saharan Africa outside South Africa). This conference was supported by the African Industry Tax Association (a group of multinationals with multiple-country presence within Africa) and hosted at the premises of ENS with the facilitation of Celia Bekker (ENS Executive: African Regulatory and Business Intelligence). The conference was held on 8 and 9 June 2015.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTAXtalkSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207