Genome-wide identification and characterization of small RNAs in <i>Rhodobacter capsulatus</i> and identification of small RNAs affected by loss of the response regulator CtrA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) are involved in the control of numerous cellular processes through various regulatory mechanisms, and in the past decade many studies have identified sRNAs in a multitude of bacterial species using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Here, we present the first genome-wide analysis of sRNA sequencing data in Rhodobacter capsulatus, a purple nonsulfur photosynthetic alphaproteobacterium. Using a recently developed bioinformatics approach, sRNA-Detect, we detected 422 putative sRNAs from R. capsulatus RNA-seq data. Based on their sequence similarity to sRNAs in a sRNA collection, consisting of published putative sRNAs from 23 additional bacterial species, and RNA databases, the sequences of 124 putative sRNAs were conserved in at least one other bacterial species; and, 19 putative sRNAs were assigned a predicted function. We bioinformatically characterized all putative sRNAs and applied machine learning approaches to calculate the probability of a nucleotide sequence to be a bona fide sRNA. The resulting quantitative model was able to correctly classify 95.2% of sequences in a validation set. We found that putative cis-targets for antisense and partially overlapping sRNAs were enriched with protein-coding genes involved in primary metabolic processes, photosynthesis, compound binding, and with genes forming part of macromolecular complexes. We performed differential expression analysis to compare the wild type strain to a mutant lacking the response regulator CtrA, an important regulator of gene expression in R. capsulatus, and identified 18 putative sRNAs with differing levels in the two strains. Finally, we validated the existence and expression patterns of four novel sRNAs by Northern blot analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".