MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601586594 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2016.7881194

Regular and Static Sector-Based Cell Switch-Off Patterns

2016· article· en· W2601586594 on OpenAlexaff
Tamer Beitelmal, Sebastian S. Szyszkowicz, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersMinistère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
KeywordsInterference (communication)Computer scienceTelecommunications linkGrid cellGridSet (abstract data type)Computer networkDistributed computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy saving in cellular networks can be achieved by implementing the cell switch-off (CSO) approach in periods of light traffic. Regular static CSO (CSO patterns) is a type of CSO where the set of active cells is predetermined such that they are located on a regular grid. It is known that regular cell layouts generally provide the best coverage and downlink SINR. Furthermore, CSO patterns assure that interfering cells are as far away as possible and help in modeling interference accurately. Existing lit- erature on CSO patterns focuses only on site-level CSO (switching off entire BSs); however, significant gains can sometimes be obtained from sector-level CSO patterns (switching off individual sectors). This paper is the first to introduce and investi- gate sector- based regular CSO patterns by providing illustrative examples. We compare the performances of different CSO patterns in terms of the number of supported users. Also, we analytically compare site- based versus sector-based CSO patterns in terms of power saving. Our results show that patterns with only one of the three sectors active (each with the same orientation) can support the most users per sector, due to a favourable interference situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207