MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601760357

Putting online and blended learning in line with institutional strategy: Policy, practice, and research

2015· article· en· W2601760357 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kathleen Matheos, Martha Cleveland‐Innes, Heather Kanuka, Alan Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Society for the Study of Higher Education · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic UniversityUniversity of AlbertaAthabasca UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlended learningCompetition (biology)Online learningHigher educationQuality (philosophy)SociologyPolitical sciencePedagogyPublic relationsBusinessEducational technologyKnowledge managementComputer scienceMultimedia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How far has Canadian higher education come in the pedagogical confirmation and implementation of high quality online and blended learning? Beyond arguments for greater access to education and technology integration for learning, public support and increasing competition have put online and blended learning on the agendas of senior administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.091
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.091
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0080.024
Scholarly communication0.0300.022
Open science0.0050.009
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Society for the Study of Higher EducationSame topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207