Development and implementation of a national service learning experience with baccalaureate nursing students: Supporting development of cultural awareness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This case study report provides an overview of a pilot program comprised of the concept and the value of service learning, a discussion of the development process and implementation, and shares the experiences of both the baccalaureate nursing students and faculty. This pilot program provided the opportunity for students to embody the values of the mission of the university which is centered on the development of thoughtful and responsible citizens. The department of nursing mission is congruent with this pursuit. Both missions reinforce the importance of providing students with varied opportunities to make socially significant contributions. This pilot supported the students’ journey in incorporating related program outcomes of social justice with diverse population as a caring nursing professional. Providing care to residents in a culturally and geographically different location within the United States promoted a deeper understanding of cultural awareness and sensitivity and development of nursing identity. This case study discusses the implementation of the pilot which included student orientation, direct care at a mobile health clinic, and post clinic debriefings. Student feedback and faculty evaluation verified this was a positive and valuable service learning opportunity, which resulted in the decision to continue a national service learning experience annually.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".