MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601791084

Galileo BOC(1,1) Prototype Receiver Development

2004· article· en· W2601791084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neil Gerein, M. Olynik, Michael Clayton

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2004) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinary offset carrier modulationGalileo (satellite navigation)TransmitterGNSS applicationsRadio receiver designComputer sciencePhase-shift keyingElectronic engineeringField-programmable gate arrayGlobal Positioning SystemEngineeringComputer hardwareTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Frequency modulationBit error rateChannel (broadcasting)Remote sensingAmplitude modulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In February 2004, the EU and the US reached an agreement on the baseline signal structure to be used in Galileo. Of particular interest to receiver manufacturers is the open service Binary Offset Carrier BOC(1,1) modulation format to be transmitted at the L1 frequency. In preparation for the transmission of the first Galileo signals from space, NovAtel initiated development of their first prototype Galileo receiver, capable of tracking BOC(1,1) signals. NovAtel has successfully completed a contract with the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) to develop an FPGA based prototype of a Galileo BOC(1,1) receiver. The receiver is based on NovAtel’s new FPGA based precise positioning receiver, the Euro-L5. The receiver FPGA and software is configured to track the open service BOC(1,1) signal that will be transmitted on the Galileo L1 frequency. To reduce hardware design costs for this pre-production prototype development, the design was demonstrated at the L5/E5a frequency. No commercial Galileo hardware simulators are currently available to test the receiver. NovAtel modified an L5 signal transmitter, developed by NovAtel for Zeta Associates of Fairfax, Virginia, to output BOC(1,1) and BPSK(1) test signals. An overview of the NovAtel Euro-L5 FPGA based precise positioning receiver will be presented. The CSA sponsored BOC(1,1) receiver/transmitter development effort will be discussed. The expected results for the pseudorange noise will be derived for the BPSK and BOC signals. Test results of the prototype BOC(1,1) receiver will be presented and compared with performance results from a BPSK(1) receiver and the expected results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2004)Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207