MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601808381 · doi:10.1080/00028487.2017.1285353

Bull Trout Movements Match the Life History of Sockeye Salmon: Consumers Can Exploit Seasonally Distinct Resource Pulses

2017· article· en· W2601808381 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathan B. Furey, S. G. Hinch

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Fisheries Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFisheries Society of the British IslesCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsOncorhynchusChinook windTroutFisheryHabitatLife historyBiologySalvelinusEnvironmental scienceEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Resource pulses provide consumers with opportunities to feed at high rates. The spawning and die‐off of semelparous Pacific salmon provide consumers with feeding opportunities that contribute substantially to annual energy budgets. The life history of Pacific salmon also includes the downstream migration of smolts, which could provide similar opportunities for consumers to exploit. We tracked seasonal movements of adult Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus in and out of the Chilko Lake–River outlet in interior British Columbia, which is characterized by a large Sockeye Salmon Oncorhynchus nerka population. Use of the outlet, lake, and river habitats were compared with the timing of out‐migrations of Sockeye Salmon smolt and the spawning events of Sockeye Salmon, Chinook Salmon O. tshawytscha, and Coho Salmon O. kisutch. Bull Trout activity and residency in the outlet increased during the spring Sockeye Salmon smolt out‐migration, and 40% of Bull Trout were found to return to the outlet in successive years. During Sockeye Salmon spawning, Bull Trout residency was increased in the river where most Sockeye Salmon spawning occurs. Therefore, Bull Trout may exploit both life history events, although direct consumption of eggs was not observed. Spawning by Chinook Salmon and Coho Salmon in the river did not appear to attract Bull Trout; Bull Trout residency increased in the lake (where spawning does not occur) during these times. Bull Trout residency in the lake also increased when outlet water temperatures were >16°C, and thus the lake may provide thermal refuge when river temperatures are above optima for this coldwater char. This research demonstrates that movements of aquatic consumers can depend upon smolt out‐migrations, and such movements can allow exploitation of multiple pulses that are seasonally distinct. These results also highlight the ecological significance of Pacific salmon for consumers in freshwater systems. Received August 18, 2016; accepted January 11, 2017 Published online March 21, 2017

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Fisheries SocietySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207