MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601809768 · doi:10.1177/2167696817702066

Religious and Community Hurdles to Pornography Consumption

2017· article· en· W2601809768 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerging Adulthood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPornographyConsumption (sociology)Context (archaeology)AttendanceSocial psychologyPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceGeographySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research demonstrates that attending religious services is associated with lower pornography consumption in emerging adults but is less clear on associations between pornography consumption and additional religious and communal factors. This research presents an innovative approach to this question by using a “hurdle” model to separately examine prevalence and frequency of pornography consumption in a national sample of emerging adults. Analyses show that both private religious activities and community volunteering are associated with lower prevalence of consumption, but only in the context of regular attendance at religious services. Neither factor is associated with the frequency of consumption. Further, these associations are robust to controls for bias due to prior pornography consumption. Initiating and accelerating pornography consumption constitute distinct processes, and research on emerging adults should consider separate influences on each. Further, attendance at religious services forms a crucial context for the efficacy of additional religious and communal factors in deterring consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it