MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601988350

Intercultural Relations in Magna Graecia

2013· article· en· W2601988350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arianna Esposito, Airton Pollini

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogues d histoire ancienne · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegemonyColonialismContext (archaeology)Identity (music)PoliticsPerspective (graphical)Quarter (Canadian coin)ReciprocalHistorySociologyArchaeologyPolitical scienceAestheticsArtPhilosophyLinguisticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to have a better understanding of intercultural processes and, at the same time, to discuss our methodological models, this paper analyzes intercultural and political relations of Greek colonies of South Italy and Sicily. We give special emphasis on the nature and forms of reciprocal relations between Greek colonial contexts and the Natives. The first aspect of our paper consists in highlighting the nature of certain mixed dynamics in colonial encounters, “internal” as well as “external”. This can be viewed as a draft of the modes of elaboration of Greek identity in a colonial context. We also comment an example of “archaeology of encounter”. In this perspective, we analyze the archaeological evidence coming from some necropoleis of the territory of Poseidonia, dated to the period of Lucanian hegemony, i.e. from the end of 5th century to the first quarter of the 3rd century BCE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialogues d histoire ancienneSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207