MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2601988350

Intercultural Relations in Magna Graecia

2013· article· en· W2601988350 on OpenAlex
Arianna Esposito, Airton Pollini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogues d histoire ancienne · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegemonyColonialismContext (archaeology)Identity (music)PoliticsPerspective (graphical)Quarter (Canadian coin)ReciprocalHistorySociologyArchaeologyPolitical scienceAestheticsArtPhilosophyLinguisticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to have a better understanding of intercultural processes and, at the same time, to discuss our methodological models, this paper analyzes intercultural and political relations of Greek colonies of South Italy and Sicily. We give special emphasis on the nature and forms of reciprocal relations between Greek colonial contexts and the Natives. The first aspect of our paper consists in highlighting the nature of certain mixed dynamics in colonial encounters, “internal” as well as “external”. This can be viewed as a draft of the modes of elaboration of Greek identity in a colonial context. We also comment an example of “archaeology of encounter”. In this perspective, we analyze the archaeological evidence coming from some necropoleis of the territory of Poseidonia, dated to the period of Lucanian hegemony, i.e. from the end of 5th century to the first quarter of the 3rd century BCE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it