Hungry at the Banquet of Reason: Rationality and Irrationality in the Life and Work of Jane Ellen Harrison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jane Harrison (1850–1928), premier savant d’origine britannique à explorer l’irrationnel dans la religion grecque, plaçait les origines de celle-ci non chez Homère, mais dans les sources non écrites comme les rites et l’art. Le rituel la séduisait beaucoup, car son conservatisme inhérent préservait les pratiques des peuples « primitives », lesquelles, pensait-elle, recelaient l’essence même de la religion. Cet attrait s’expliquait aussi par des raisons tout à fait personnelles. Des expériences vécues dans sa prime enfance avaient suscité en elle une haine tenace envers tout dogme. Plus tard au cours de sa vie adulte, la dépression et la solitude la poussèrent à accorder beaucoup d’importance au sentiment et à la communauté. Il en résulta une compréhension du rationnel et de l’irrationnel, de l’importance du supra-rationnel et de l’infra-rationnel, bien différente des attitudes conventionnelles de son époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.046 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".