Mālama nā makua i nā keiki me ka hānō: Native Hawaiian Parents Caring for Their Children with Asthma, (Part 2)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Native Hawaiian children have the highest prevalence of asthma among all ethnicities in Hawai'i. Mlama Part 2 describes continuing research, exploring contemporary native Hawaiian parents' perspective, and experience of caring for their children with asthma in the context of uncertainty while living on the islands of Hawaii, Kauai, Maui, Molokai and Lnai. Design: Descriptive qualitative approach by means of directed content analysis using focus groups was applied to this study. Eight open-ended questions elicited asthma history, asthma management, and how the Hawaiian culture affects parents' health practices. Directed content analysis applied Mishel's Uncertainty in Illness Theory (UIT) to guide data collection, organization, and analysis. Sample: Thirtythree native Hawaiian parents with a child with asthma met in 9 separate focus groups during 2012-2015 on the islands of Hawaii, Kauai, Maui, Molokai, and Lnai. Results: The study's findings were congruent with the first Mlama study results of focus groups on Oahu. Contextual influences including indigenous worldview, cultural values, history, and assimilation and acculturation factors affected native Hawaiian parents' perceptions and experiences with conventional asthma care. Moreover, Hawaiian parents living on islands outside of metropolitan Oahu reported geographic barriers that contributed to their uncertainty. Conclusion: Political action is required for comprehensive medical care, health education, and nursing services to be delivered to families living on all islands. Integrating Hawaiian cultural values, involving 'ohana, and applying complementary alternative therapies as well as standard asthma management will strongly support native Hawaiian parents caring for their children with asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".