MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2602117107 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2689504

Joint Traffic Scheduling and Resource Allocations for Traffic Offloading With Secrecy Provisioning

2017· article· en· W2602117107 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuan Wu, Jianchao Zheng, Kuanyang Guo, Liping Qian, Xuemin Shen, Yueming Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceProvisioningComputer networkJoint (building)SecrecyDistributed computingEngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent paradigm of small cell dual-connectivity (DC) provides a promising solution to facilitate mobile users' (MUs') traffic offloading in heterogeneous networks. With DC, an MU can flexibly schedule its traffic to macrocell base station (mBS) and offload data to small-cell access point (sAP). However, a malicious node might intentionally eavesdrop the MU's offloaded data, which could lead to the secrecy exposure. In this paper, we investigate the optimal resource allocation for the MUs' traffic offloading via DC with guaranteed secrecy. First, we study a single-MU single-sAP case and formulate a joint optimization of the MU's traffic scheduling, power allocation, and bandwidth usage for traffic offloading, which aims to minimize the MU's overall resource usage including the power consumption and bandwidth usage. Although the joint optimization problem is nonconvex, we propose an efficient algorithm to obtain the optimal offloading solution. Second, by using the single-MU's optimal offloading solution, we study the multi-MU multi-sAP case and formulate an optimal offloading-selection problem that aims to maximize the overall served MUs' throughput with guaranteed secrecy, while taking into account the mBS's and sAPs' limited bandwidths and the sAPs' limited backhaul capacities. Despite the NP-hardness of the formulated offloading-selection problem, we propose an efficient heuristic algorithm to achieve the offloading-selection solution. Numerical results are provided to validate the performance gain of the proposed traffic offloading schemes with guaranteed secrecy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207