BACK PAINS AND EMOTIONAL DISORDERS IN ADOLESCENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim. To study the peculiarities of pain syndrome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Materials and methods. Back pains in idiopathic scoliosis were analyzed in 98 patients aged 12-16. The control group consisted of 12 practically healthy persons. Computer optic topography, Visual Analogous Pain Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Spielberger-Khanin Anxiety Scale, Beck and Zung Depression Scales were used. Statistical processing of the results was carried out by means of nonparametric Mann-Whitney test with Statistica 8.0 package for Windows. Results. Moderate and mild pain of bursting character in case of physical load and long static tension was stated among subjects with degrees I and II idiopathic scoliosis. However, among girls sensor and affective components of pain syndrome were more marked. Besides, in women statistically significant rise in reactive anxiety was established. No depression in adolescents suffering from idiopathic scoliosis was detected. Conclusion. Back pain in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is developing at the first stages of disease with subsequent reduction and is accompanied by increase in the level of reactive anxiety, predominantly, among men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".