Emerging Adulthood in Israeli Families: Individual-Social Tasks and Emotional-Relational Challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study explores the developmental tasks of emerging adulthood within both the practical-individual and the emotional parent-youth relationship context, relying on developmental and systemic approaches to the family. Content analysis of data collected in 11 in-depth interviews in a preliminary qualitative phase led to the development of the Emerging Adulthood Questionnaire (EAQ), which was then used to collect quantitative data from 300 respondents, members of 100 families. The content analysis revealed two specific domains: individual-social tasks and emotional-relational tasks, the latter containing two related factors of youth-parent connectedness and youth-parent orientation. The analyses of the quantitative data, on both individual and family levels, reveal a rich and complicated picture. Results show that while loose connectedness with rejective orientation was clearly related to the poorest level of accomplishment of individual-social tasks, high accomplishment of these tasks was related to the combination of tight or close connectedness with dependent or autonomous orientation. Comparisons between fathers, mothers, and youths show marked similarities, but also some significant differences. These and additional results are discussed in light of a proposed model for family emotional launching style in the context of the family system theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".