Saisir les enjeux de la maternité de substitution sous le prisme de la théorie générale du contrat : quelles perspectives en France et au Québec ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La maternité de substitution constitue un défi majeur pour le législateur, tant il suscite des passions de tous ordres. En France comme au Québec, l’idée même d’un encadrement juridique de cette pratique est loin d’être consensuelle. La présente étude propose une réflexion singulière sur ses enjeux complexes, à l’aune de la théorie générale du contrat. L’idée est de questionner la rationalité des comportements des « agents » en cause (mère porteuse et parents intentionnels) à la lumière des principes directeurs du droit des contrats, pour tenter de montrer que les dimensions juridiques et éthiques sont indissociables non seulement dans la compréhension mais aussi dans l’encadrement nécessaire de cette pratique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".