Bibliographic record
Abstract
The British group at the Rencontres in Montréal in 1974 included three people who represented three poles of radical film culture in the U.K. at the time. Simon Hartog represented the radical wing within the film union, the Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians (ACTT), and was the researcher for the union’s report on nationalising the film industry. Nick Hart Williams represented The Other Cinema (TOC), an alternative distribution non-profit collective with a focus on political films from the Third World and political fare from Europe and the U.S. Gustav Lamche was a founding member of Cinema Action, a political collective that established particularly strong links within the trades union movement. The nationalisation plan was utopian and quietly dropped, but the growing band of independent political filmmakers, who were mostly outside the union, came together in 1976 to form the Independent Film-Makers' Association (IFA), which negotiated a Workshop Agreement with the ACTT and was recognised with slots on the new Channel Four when it started broadcasting in 1982.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".