MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2602395915 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-43308-4_7

Aggressive, Beleaguered, Commercial, Defiant: Marc Klaw and Abraham Erlanger

2017· book-chapter· en· W2602395915 on OpenAlexaff
Marlis Schweitzer

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyndicateGeneral partnershipAgency (philosophy)ArtArt historyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theatrical production partnership of entrepreneur A. L. Erlanger (1859–1930) and attorney Marcus Klaw (1858–1936) began as a theatrical booking agency in 1886 before expanding into producing plays and musicals. They became part of the Theatrical Syndicate in 1896. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicTheater, Performance, and Music HistoryFrench-language works237,207