Staging the Role of Identification, Placement, and Review Committees (IPRC) for Children with Special Needs in French Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cet article traite du signalement de l'enfance en difficulté dans les écoles minoritaires de langue française en Ontario (Canada). À partir de données provenant du projet de recherche ?Trajectoires sociales et scolaires d?élèves en difficulté à l'école primaire de langue française en Ontario? (mené entre 2000 et 2003), il s?agit, en particulier, de comprendre le fonctionnement des comités d?identification, de placement et de révision (CIPR) qui réunissent des membres du personnel de l'école et des parents. Une méthodologie exploitant des données d?observation et des entretiens permet de mettre en évidence les débats, les discussions et les négociations entourant le signalement des élèves considérés comme étant en difficulté. Cette méthodologie privilégie une compréhension de l'activité humaine qui tient compte de la complexité des interactions sociales. Le cas d?un signalement d?un élève est présenté sous forme de mise en scène.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".