MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2602514102

Lower urinary tract symptoms in adults treated for posterior urethral valves in childhood: matched cohort study

2011· article· en· W2602514102 on OpenAlexaff
Kari A.O. Tikkinen, Jukka Heikkilä, Risto Rintala, Teuvo L.J. Tammela, Seppo Taskinen

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurourology and Urodynamics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrinary systemLower urinary tract symptomsPosterior urethral valveCohort studyCohortSurgeryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: We compared the prevalence and bother of lower urinary tract symptoms in adults treated for posterior urethral valves in childhood and population based controls.Materials and Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to patients 18 years and older treated at our institution for posterior urethral valves. Of the 124 patients 68 (64.2%) participated, 18 were unavailable and 38 did not participate. Age and sex matched controls were randomly identified from a population based study (response proportion 62.4%). Danish Prostatic Symptom Score was used to assess occurrence (never/rarely/often/always) and bother (none/small/moderate/major) of 12 different lower urinary tract symptoms. Chi-square test was used for the analyses stratified by patient/control status, with the 4-point ordinal scale as the outcome.Results: Median age of 68 patients with posterior urethral valves and 272 controls (ratio 1:4) was 38.5 years (range 18 to 57). Overall, at least 1 moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptom was report...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurourology and UrodynamicsSame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207