High Freshets and Low-Lying Farms: Property Law and St. John River Flooding in Colonial New Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although New Brunswick was founded on private land ownership, colonists who settled low-lying land along the St. John River found that the waterway’s erratic flood cycle and ever-changing nature threatened their lives and farms, and thwarted their efforts to divide riverbanks and islands into fixed parcels of private property. This article draws upon colonial petitions, sessional court records, and colonial legislation in analyzing the response of the colonial legislature and of local governance to the challenge that the St. John River created for property rights and a private land management system dependent on static boundaries and fixed fences. In examining the colonists’ attempts to adapt property law to foster appropriate responses to their changing environment and social needs, this article provides insight into the evolution of colonial law, local governance, the ecological knowledge of farmers, social conflict, and adaptations to flooding in early New Brunswick. Meme si le Nouveau-Brunswick a ete fonde sur la propriete privee des terres, les colons qui se sont installes sur les terres basses le long du fleuve Saint-Jean ont constate que l’imprevisibilite de ses crues et sa nature perpetuellement changeante menacaient leur vie et leurs fermes et contrecarraient leurs efforts pour diviser les berges et les iles en parcelles fixes. L’auteur examine des petitions deposees par des colons, des dossiers de la Cour des sessions et les lois coloniales pour analyser la reponse de la legislature coloniale et des administrations locales au defi que presentait le fleuve Saint-Jean quant au droit de propriete et a un systeme de gestion des terres privees tributaire de limites statiques et de clotures fixes. Tout en relatant les tentatives des colons d’adapter le droit de la propriete pour arriver a des reponses appropriees a leur environnement changeant et aux besoins sociaux, l’auteur donne un apercu de l’evolution du droit colonial, de l’administration locale, des connaissances ecologiques des agriculteurs, des conflits sociaux et de l’adaptation aux inondations au debut du Nouveau Brunswick.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".