MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Long-term incidence of venous thromboembolic events following cystectomy: A population-based analysis.

2017· article· en· W2602730024 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher J.D. Wallis, Diana Magee, Raj Satkunasivam, Robert K. Nam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystectomyPulmonary embolismCumulative incidenceInterquartile rangeBladder cancerDeep veinIncidence (geometry)PopulationSurgeryThrombosisInternal medicineCohortCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

288 Background: Cancer and immobility both contribute to the development of venous thromboembolic events (VTE), including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. As such, patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer are at elevated risk. We sought to assess the long-term incidence of VTE among all patients undergoing radical cystectomy in the province of Ontario. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study to examine the incidence of VTE, a composite of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, among all patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between 2002 and 2014 in Ontario, Canada. We estimated the cumulative incidence of VTE and used Fine and Grey competing risk survival analysis to assess risk factors for VTE while accounting for the risk of any cause mortality. Results: Among 3623 eligible patients, the 10 year cumulative incidence of VTE was 6.68% (Table 1). Among those who experienced VTE, the median time from surgery was 216 days (interquartile range 52-677 days; mean 527 days). However, VTE rates peaked much earlier with a mode of 20 days. Neither preoperative (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.39-1.18) nor postoperative chemotherapy (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.95-1.84) were significantly associated with VTE incidence. While patients with a prior history of VTE had increased risk of VTE after cystectomy (HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.2-12.0), age, gender, comorbidity score, rurality, diversion type (continent vs ileal conduit), treatment at an academic institution, or year of treatment were not significantly associated with the risk of VTE. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer, the cumulative incidence of VTE continues to rise long after the date of surgery indicating that previous studies may have underestimated these rates, but the highest rates occur at 20 days after surgery. Chemotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of VTE. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→