MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2602780795 · doi:10.1180/minmag.2017.081.015

From structure topology to chemical composition. XXIII. Revision of the crystal structure and chemical formula of zvyaginite, Na<sub>2</sub>ZnTiNb<sub>2</sub>(Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>)<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>4</sub>, a seidozerite-supergroup mineral from the Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola peninsula, Russia

2017· article· en· W2602780795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrystallographyOctahedronElectron microprobeCrystal structureChemical compositionStructural formulaGroup (periodic table)SupergroupCrystal chemistryCrystal (programming language)ChemistryMaterials scienceMineralogyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structure and chemical formula of zvyaginite, ideally Na 2 ZnTiNb 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 (H 2 O) 4 , a lamprophyllite-group mineral of the seidozerite supergroup from the type locality, Mt. Malyi Punkaruaiv, Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia have been revised. The crystal structurewas refined with a new origin in space group C1, a = 10.769(2), b = 14.276(3), c = 12.101(2) Å, α = 105.45(3), β = 95.17(3), γ = 90.04(3)°, V = 1785.3(3.2) Å3, R1 = 9.23%. The electron-microprobe analysis gave the following empirical formula [calculated on 22 (O + F)]: (Na 0.75 Ca 0.09 K 0.04 □ 1.12 )Σ2 (Na 1.12 Zn 0.88 Mn 0.17 Fe 2+ 0.04 □ 0.79 ) Σ3 (Nb 1.68 Ti 1.25 Al 0.07 )Σ3 (Si 4.03 O 14 )O 2 [(OH) 1.11 F 0.89 ]Σ2(H 2 O) 4 , Z = 4. Electron-diffraction patterns have prominent streaking along c* and HRTEM images show an intergrowth of crystalline zvyaginite with two distinct phases, both of which are partially amorphous. The crystal structure of zvyaginite is an array of TS (Titanium-Silicate) blocks connected via hydrogen bonds between H 2 O groups. The TS block consists of HOH sheets (H = heteropolyhedral, O = octahedral) parallel to (001). In the O sheet, the [6]MO(1,4,5) sites are occupied mainly by Ti, Zn and Na and the [6] M O (2,3) sites are occupied by Na at less than 50%. In the H sheet, the [6] MH(1,2) sites are occupied mainly by Nb and the [8] AP(1) and [8] AP(2) sites are occupied mainly by Na and □. The MH and AP polyhedra and Si 2 O 7 groups constitute the H sheet. The ideal structural formula is Na□Nb 2 NaZn□Ti(Si 2 O 7 )2O 2 (OH) 2 (H 2 O)4. Zvyaginite is a Zn-bearing and Na-poor analogue of epistolite, ideally (Na□)Nb 2 Na 3 Ti(Si 2 O 7 ) 2 O 2 (OH) 2 (H 2 O) 4 . Epistolite and zvyaginite are related by the following substitution in the O sheet of the TS-block: (Naþ 2 )epi↔Zn 2+ zvy +□zvy. The doubling of the t1 and t2 translations of zvyaginite relative to those of epistolite is due to the order of Zn and Na along a (t1) and b (t2) in the O sheet of zvyaginite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0090.008
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it