A Preliminary Study of the Self-Healing of a Fully Penetrating Hole in GCLs on Full Hydration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The self-healing capacity of 25.4, 30.2, 34.9, 41.3, and 50.8 mm-diameter circular fully penetrating holes in geosynthetic clay liners under 2 kPa applied stress is compared after full hydration using deionized water and 10 mM CaCl2 solution. In deionized water, holes with diameters up to 41.3 mm self-healed but with an indentation about 1~2 mm-deep at the center of the larger self-healed zones. The hole with a diameter of 50.8 mm self-healed but the hole was filled with a layer of bentonite slurry with a 4~6 mm-deep indentation. Submerged in 10 mM CaCl2 solution, holes with diameters less than 34.9 mm self-healed with a 1~6 mm-deep indentation. The 41.3 mm-diameter hole did not close up, leaving a 26.5~28.5 mm-diameter hole. This study shows the importance of the hydrating fluid on the potential for self-healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".