MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2602808873 · doi:10.1111/ajo.12622

Outcomes of women diagnosed and treated for low‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at the Queensland Trophoblast Centre (QTC)

2017· article· en· W2602808873 on OpenAlex
Lisanne Verhoef, David Baartz, Shona Morrison, Karen Sanday, Andrea Garrett

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyNauseaRegimenInternal medicineMethotrexateAdverse effectDiseaseGestational trophoblastic diseaseChemotherapy regimenPregnancySurgeryGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is classified as a highly curable group of pregnancy-related malignancies; however, approximately 15% will be persistent and require chemotherapy. Up to 25% of these women will develop resistance and 2% will develop disease relapse after initial chemotherapy. Despite the need for further chemotherapy in these women, cure rates are high. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of women diagnosed with low-risk GTN, assessing the type of treatment, the number of chemotherapy cycles received, development of resistance or disease relapse, survival, and to assess the feasibility of changing to a new drug regimen. METHODS: From March 2012 until February 2015, a retrospective study was conducted and 38 cases with low-risk GTN were reviewed. The number of cycles, type of treatment received, duration of treatment, development of resistance and disease relapse, and adverse side effects were analysed. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 12 months. Disease-free survival was 100% and primary complete remission rates were achieved in 85.3% of patients who were treated with actinomycin D and 25% patients who were treated with methotrexate (MTX). A change in chemotherapy was required for nine patients. One patient developed disease relapse. Nausea, fatigue and constipation were the most frequent adverse events reported with actinomycin D. All women were cured of their disease. CONCLUSION: All women were successfully treated and achieved complete remission. Changing from MTX to actinomycin D as first-line chemotherapy for women with low-risk GTN was feasible and safe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it