FORMATION OF INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO THE DESIGNING OF A THREE-PRONGED CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main aim of the research in the present scientific article is oriented on the improvement of the modern theory of the sustainable economic development. The methodology of the scientific research was based upon the study of the scientific views of the scientists on such notions as sustainability and development of the economic system and its contradictions taking into account the factors of influence of the internal and external environment. During the scientific research, the opinions of the international society and the United Nations Organization regarding the modern concept of the sustainable development where the main concept is concentrated on the ecological element were taken into account. Determination of the indicative factors directly influencing the sustainability and development of the economic systems, and the evidence of its direct interaction with the existing classic three-pronged concept of the sustainable development allowed to reach the new scientific effective provisions such as modeling of the balances of sustainability of the economic systems, development of the modern classification of the types of sustainability, formation of the model of sustainable economic development as the continuous and dynamic process of the development of human potential. The research performed at the modern stage allows to develop a new policy of the sustainability of economic systems in some developing countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".