MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2602965676 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2016-0442

Partitioning of reactive yellow 86 between aqueous and micellar media studied by differential absorption spectroscopy

2017· article· en· W2602965676 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Naveed ul Haq, Muhammad Usman, Ajaz Hussain, Zahoor H. Farooqi, Muhammad Saeed, Sadia Hanif, Muhammad Irfan, Mohammad Siddiq, Usman Ali Rana

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsChemistryPulmonary surfactantMicelleAmmonium bromideAqueous solutionCritical micelle concentrationPartition coefficientAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyCationic polymerizationBromideMicellar solutionsSodium dodecyl sulfateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study describes the partitioning of a reactive dye, reactive yellow 86, between aqueous and micellar media of a cationic surfactant (cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, CTAB), as well as an anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulphate, SDS). In a systematic investigation, we have recorded the UV–vis absorption spectra of the dye as a function of surfactant’s concentration above and below the critical micelle concentration (CMC). Absorption spectra display a red shift in the case of CTAB and a hypochromic shift upon using SDS. The partition coefficient (K x ) was calculated using differential absorption data, and the value of free energy of partition (ΔG p ) was calculated using this K x value. The results revealed that the dye is solubilized in CTAB micelles to a greater extent than in SDS micelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsFrench-language works237,207