MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603095865

Profil statistique des jeunes de moins de 25 ans résidant en HLM à Montréal

2011· article· fr· W2603095865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xavier Leloup

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le logement social public de type HLM accueille une proportion importante de jeunes. Cette proportion est particulièrement élevée dans les ensembles de logements sociaux destinés aux familles. On note en effet un déclin de la taille moyenne et du nombre moyen d’enfants par ménage à Montréal dans le courant des dernières décennies. Les jeunes qui vivent en HLM expérimentent également des réalités spécifiques liées aux caractéristiques des milieux résidentiels et familiaux dans lesquels ils grandissent. Le logement social accueille principalement des ménages dont les revenus sont faibles ou modestes. Les jeunes y sont donc exposés à la précarité économique et à ses conséquences sur le bien-être et la qualité de vie des familles. Pour ces différentes raisons, l’Office municipal d’habitation de Montréal (OMHM) mène et soutient depuis de nombreuses années des interventions pour favoriser le développement social et communautaire des jeunes qui résident dans ses logements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))Same topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207