MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603122402

Teacher education and digital citizenship: Bridging classrooms, communities and digital realms

2017· article· en· W2603122402 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ruth Kane, Nicholas Ng-­A-­Fook, Linda Radford, Jesse K. Butler, Catherine E. James

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiteracy, Media, and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivicsCitizenshipBridging (networking)SociologyCitizenship educationGlobal citizenshipPedagogyDigital mediaSocial mediaPublic relationsPolitical scienceMedia studiesComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To be active citizens in today’s media-saturated world, youth need to use, critique, and create digital media; yet, there is still relatively little experimental research on new pedagogical approaches to support urban youth as future digital citizens. The introduction of new technologies into the classroom continues to be a challenge for educators, especially when concerned about developing active citizenship among urban youth, many of whom are newcomers to Canada. We argue that urban youth would greatly benefit from innovative inquiry-based pedagogies that afford them opportunities to connect to local, national, and global communities from their classroom as digital citizens. This symposium will use emerging findings from a SSHRC-funded study to consider some innovative practices for reconceptualizing and developing teacher candidates’ knowledge of digital literacies, civics, and citizenship education in order to respond to such 21 st century urban contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.021
Scholarly communication0.0140.011
Open science0.0010.014
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicLiteracy, Media, and EducationFrench-language works237,207