MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603128418 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2016.7880987

Energy Efficient Pilot and Data Power Allocation in Multi-Cell Multi-User Massive MIMO Communication Systems

2016· article· en· W2603128418 on OpenAlexaff
Ye Zhang, Wei‐Ping Zhu, Jian Ouyang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkComputer scienceMIMOMinimum mean square errorTransmitter power outputSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioTransmission (telecommunications)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Channel (broadcasting)Real-time computingInterference (communication)Electronic engineeringPower (physics)Computer networkTelecommunicationsTransmitterEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a joint pilot and data power allocation scheme aiming to improve the energy efficiency of time division duplexing (TDD) massive multi-user multiple-input multiple-output (MU-MIMO) communication systems for both uplink and downlink transmission. The proposed scheme uses a maximum-ratio combining (MRC) detector in the uplink together with a maximum-ratio transmission (MRT) precoder in the downlink. By using minimum mean square error (MMSE) channel estimation, the total uplink and downlink transmit power is minimized under per-user signal to interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) requirement and per-user power consumption constraints. Lower bounds of the average SINR are derived and used in the power allocation algorithm in order to simplify the optimization problem. The tightness of the derived SINR lower bounds and the advantage of the proposed power saving scheme as compared to equal power allocation among all users are validated by computer simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207