Outcome of Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell in British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare and heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) that accounts for approximately 10% of all aggressive NHLs in Western countries. The optimal management remains unclear, however, given the poor outcome, allogeneic transplant (allo-SCT) has been integrated into the front-line treatment for some rare extranodal subtypes as well in relapsed/refractory setting. We report our provincial experience of the outcome of patients with PTCL who have undergone allo-SCT at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA). Methods: The Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia database and the BCCA Lymphoid Cancer Database were searched to identify all patients diagnosed with PTCL who have undergone allo-SCT between November 1990 and January 2016. Overall survival and relapse free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 36 cases of PTCL patients who have undergone allogeneic transplant from a median time of 11 months from primary diagnosis (range 4-64) with the following clinical features: median age at transplant was 45 years (range 16-58 years); 24 (67%) were male; 32 (89%) patients had advanced stage disease; 22 (61%) had B-symptoms at diagnosis. Bone marrow involvement detected in 13/34 (38%) patients. Histological diagnosis based on the WHO 2008 classification were: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) n=15 (42%); anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) n=7 (19%) out of which three were ALK positive, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) n=6 (17%), hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma n=5 (14%), enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma type I n=1, advanced primary cutaneous gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma n=1 and Sezary syndrome n=1. Ten patients (28%) underwent allo-SCT as part of planned primary therapy after achieving their first remission [6 were in complete remission 1 (CR1) and 4 were in partial remission 1 (PR1)], whereas 26 patients (72%) underwent allo-SCT for relapsed/refractory disease. CHOP was administered in 19 patients (53%) as the primary therapy. 17 (47%) patients received alternative chemotherapy regimen due to patient and/or physician preference. The clinical status at the time of transplantation was CR in 12 patients (33%), relapsed sensitive disease n=10 (28%), relapsed untreated n=5 (14%), partial remission (PR) in 5 (14%), primary progressive disease n=3 (8%) and relapsed resistant disease n=1 (3%). Thirty two patients (89%) underwent myeloablative conditioning, 4 (11%) underwent reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). The conditioning regimens included: cyclophosphamide/TBI n=24 (67%), busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=5 (14%), fludarabine containing reduced intensity n=4 (11%), and other regimens n= 3 (8%). With a median follow-up of alive patients from the time of allo-SCT of 69 months (range 1-186 months). At last follow-up, 17 (47%) patients have died, 6 from disease relapse, 5 from graft vs host disease (GVHD), 2 from regimen related toxicity and 4 from other causes. Nineteen patients (53%) still alive at last follow up post-transplant of which 14 (39%) still in remission. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of allo-SCT of all patients were 43% and 63%, respectively. For PTCL-NOS the 5-year EFS and OS were 52% and 69%, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the patients' characteristics. Figures 1 and 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and EFS respectively. Conclusion: Allo-SCT can be effective strategy in select patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL and those with high risk histologies in the upfront setting PTCL with an acceptable toxicity. Disclosures Toze: Roche Canada: Research Funding. Sehn:roche/genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scott:NanoString Technologies: Patents & Royalties: named inventor on a patent for molecular subtyping of DLBCL that has been licensed to NanoString Technologies. Villa:Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Connors:NanoString Technologies: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Song:Janssen: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".