Boron Subphthalocyanine Coupled to Methacrylate‐Rich Terpolymers by Nitroxide Mediated Polymerization: The Subphthalocyanine Dictates the Phase Transition Temperatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The control of the glass transition temperature ( T g ) of methacrylic acid–styrene terpolymers with n ‐butyl methacrylate (BMA) is scoped to assess their potential to alter the thermal transitions of boron subphthalocyanine (BsubPc)‐containing polymers. The change in kinetics and physical properties of the terpolymers are observed under different synthetic and process conditions such as varying molar feed of BMA, addition of 1,4‐dioxane solvent, reaction time, concentration of N ‐tert‐butyl‐ N ‐(1‐diethylphosphono‐2,2‐dimethylpropyl) nitroxide (SG1) mediator and initiator type to find the optimal conditions. Four terpolymers are then coupled to BsubPc using the established process. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis shows that the backbone polymer composition has little effect on the T g of the poly‐BsubPcs. Solid‐state fluorescence spectroscopy reveals that after annealing the films at temperatures higher than the T g , BsubPc aggregates are formed and, therefore, the arrangement of the polymers is dominated by the BsubPc moiety and its self‐aggregation. image
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".