Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Alberta, homelessness is a persistent social issue that affects over 8,000 people directly. Not only is this emotionally, physically and mentally taxing on the person experiencing homelessness, but it also takes its toll on the public purse. It is estimated that the cost of supporting a chronically homeless person can be as high as $100,000 annually when you take all of the publically provided services that are used. To address this problem, in 2009 Alberta initiated a 10 year plan to end homelessness in the province. This plan uses a Housing First approach, which focuses on providing housing before any other social supports, and has been proven to be a more cost effective way of addressing homelessness than the traditional model. While Housing First may reduce the cost of addressing homelessness, the Alberta Government is facing tightening budgetary restraints and a growing deficit due to the low cost of oil. Social Impact Bonds, a financial tool that can be used to harness private capital to fund public services, could provide the capital necessary to sustain these programs as the province weathers the economic recession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".