MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603323257 · doi:10.14740/jcgo417w

Tubal Serous Borderline Tumor With Strongly Positive p53 Which Developed in a 50-Year-Old Woman

2017· article· en· W2603323257 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hiroharu Kobayashi, Michiyasu Kawai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSerous fluidGynecologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 50-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for the treatment of left ovarian tumor. Transvaginal ultrasound examination revealed a unilocular lesion of 4 cm diameter at left adnexa and magnetic resonance imaging showed a solid component with contrast effect at the luminal wall. She underwent laparotomy for the diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma at laparotomy. It revealed globally swelled left fallopian tube and normal left ovary. Histopathological examination of frozen section of left adnexa showed serous borderline tumor of left fallopian tube. Additionally, hysterectomy, right salpingo-oophorectomy and partial omentectomy were performed. Final pathologic diagnosis was serous borderline tumor of left fallopian tube (FIGO stage IA). She had no recurrent sign 1 year after surgery. Borderline tumor of fallopian tube is very rare. There were 21 previously reported cases, 15 cases being serous, five cases mucinous and one case endometrioid. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2017;6(1):17-22 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo417w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207