MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2603332025 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex065

Cardiovascular effects of urate-lowering therapies in patients with chronic gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017· review· en· W2603332025 on OpenAlex
Tony Zhang, Janet Pope

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGoutMeta-analysisInternal medicineUric acidIntensive care medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To determine if urate-lowering treatment (ULT) in gout can reduce cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Methods: Randomized trials were searched for treatment with ULT in gout. Eligible trials had to report CV safety of a ULT. Potential medications included allopurinol, febuxostat, pegloticase, rasburicase, probenecid, benzbromarone, sulphinpyrazone, losartan, fenofibrate and sodium-glucose linked transporter 2 inhibitors. Results: A total of 3084 citations were found, with 642 duplicates. After the primary screen, 35 studies were selected for review. Several trials did not report CV events. Six were not randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four studies reported no events in either intervention arm while the other four had 40 events in the febuxostat group ( n = 3631) and 5 in allopurinol group ( n = 1154). Overall, the pooled analysis did not show a significant difference between the two [febuxostat vs allopurinol: relative risk (RR) 1.69 (95% CI 0.54, 5.34), P = 0.37]. CV events did not decrease over time. Comparing shorter studies (<52 weeks) to longer ones did not reveal any statistical differences. However, in long-term studies with febuxostat vs allopurinol, results were nearly significant, with more CVE occurring with febuxostat treatment. Comparing any ULT to placebo (eight studies, n = 2221 patients) did not demonstrate a significant difference in non-Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration events [any ULT vs placebo: RR 1.47 (95% CI 0.49, 4.40), P = 0.49] or all-cause mortality [any ULT vs placebo: RR 1.45 (95% CI 0.35, 5.77), P = 0.60]. Conclusion: RCT data do not suggest differences in CV events among ULTs in gout. Trials had few events despite high-risk patients being enrolled and may have been too short to show CV reduction by controlling inflammatory attacks and lowering uric acid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it