Czech and Slovak Family Patterns and Family Values in Historical, Social and Cultural Context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Family as one of the social institutions may be considered as a psycho-physical, social, spiritual and cultural-historical phenomenon. The article presents the analysis of various perspectives on family development nowadays provided by psychologists, sociologists, social anthropologists, historians, journalists, and writers. This analysis is accompanied by some statistic data presented in the text, in the Tables, and Graphs. A brief outline of the history of family relations in former Czechoslovakia, the Czech Republic and Slovakia facilitates the understanding of their family values and family lifestyle which are still preserved in modern families. An attempt is made to describe the place of these two countries in the system of Eastern and Western European civilizations. Special attention is devoted to the changes in political, economic and social life allcr the disintegration of Czechoslovakia in 1989, which had both positive and negative effects. On the one band, because of the transition from a totalitarian to a democratic society and urbanization men have lost their function of bread-winners and women have won more political, social and economic freedom; on the other hand there appeared nonmarital cohabitation, strong individualism and independence, which have led to a drop in birth rates and an increase in divorce rates. Despite the negative influence of these factors on their traditional lifestyle, Czechs and Slovaks still preserve their spiritual and moral values. The examples show how the major family problems raised and discussed by the Czech and Slovak scholars arc reflected in projects, social campaigns, mass media, and fiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".