Community-level facilitation by macroalgal foundation species peaks at an intermediate level of environmental stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper examines how community-level facilitation by macroalgal foundation species changes with environmental stress. In rocky intertidal habitats, abiotic stress (mainly due to desiccation and thermal extremes during low tides) increases sharply with elevation because of tide dynamics. A previous study done on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia (Canada) showed that, at low elevations, where conditions are benign because low tides are brief, fucoid algal canopies ( Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus spp.) do not affect the structure of benthic communities. However, at middle and high elevations, where low tides last longer, fucoid canopies limit abiotic extremes near the substrate and, in that way, increase the richness of benthic communities. Richness was measured as the number of benthic algal (except fucoids) and invertebrate species found in replicate quadrats. Using the published data from that study, the present study compares the intensity of facilitation and its importance (relative to all other sources of variation in richness) between middle and high elevations, which represent intermediate and high stress, respectively. Facilitation intensity was calculated as the percent increase in benthic richness between quadrats with low canopy cover and quadrats with high canopy cover, while the importance of facilitation was calculated as the percentage of observed variation in richness that was explained by canopy cover. Data for a total of 688 quadrats surveyed along 350 km of coastline were used. The analyses revealed that both the intensity and importance of facilitation were greater at middle elevations than at high elevations. As canopies were previously found not to affect benthic communities at low elevations, this study indicates that the facilitation–stress relationship viewed at the community level is unimodal for this marine system. Such a trend was already found for some terrestrial systems involving canopy-forming plants as foundation species. Thus, this unimodal pattern may be ubiquitous in nature and, as further studies refine it, might help to predict community-level facilitation depending on environmental stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".