The Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Children’s Educational Achievement in the Korean Immigrant Family
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between parental involvement and children’s educational achievement in the Korean American family. The primary purposes are to examine the extent and characteristics of parental involvement and the consequences of children’s educational achievement. Various dimensions of parental involvement are measured as separate variables. Data from a sample of children aged 12 through 14 (n = 209) and their parents (n = 209) are used to test the research hypothesis.***Parental involvement in the Korean American family is characterized by an extremely high level of home based parental involvement and a comparatively much lower level of school based parental involvement. Parents’ education level and English proficiency substantially influence the extent of parental involvement and children’s educational achievement. Thus, we could conclude that reflecting both traditional cultural norms and the levels of parents’ adaptation to their new world, the parental involvement of the Korean American family revealed its own distinctive characteristics and impact on children’s educational achievement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it